← All projects/Space/No. 32
2020 · Space · ALA Architects

Porvoo Square Benchmark

Before redesigning Porvoo’s main square, the team benchmarked it against five other recently renovated Nordic and Baltic squares — using check-in data, not opinion, to work out what actually made those renovations succeed or fail.

Porvoo Square Benchmark

Porvoo wanted to redesign its main square, but good precedent research is hard to do well — most benchmarking relies on site visits and impressions. This study used the same activity-mapping method across six cities to make the comparison consistent and evidence-based.

Built on a methodology first developed and validated across roughly 220 Finnish and Swedish cities and 200 further European examples under the Academy of Finland-funded URMI project, co-authored with Finnish urban-research partner Kaupunkikettu (“Urban Fox”).

Reclassified Foursquare’s roughly 1,000 fine-grained venue categories into Jan Gehl’s necessary/optional activity framework, mapping and comparing five already-renovated squares — Lappeenranta, Kuopio, Kristiansand, Umeå, and Tallinn’s Baltijaama market — against Porvoo’s current state, including before/after comparisons where renovation data allowed.

Delivered as a 23-page benchmark report in spring 2020.

1 report to download
About the project
ClientALA Architects
PlacePorvoo, Finland — benchmarked against Lappeenranta, Kuopio, Kristiansand, Umeå, and Tallinn
Year2020
LensSpace
TopicsBenchmarking, Public Space, Social Media Data
What we found
Porvoo’s square is already the single most-visited location in the city by check-ins (3,687), well ahead of the second-place shopping centre — a strong existing anchor before any redesign begins.
Lappeenranta’s pedestrianisation unlocked a highly active public space and won a national city-centre award, but the link between the train station and commercial core remained unresolved years later — traffic closure stayed contested even after visible success.
Kuopio’s €38M renovation produced Finland’s “best city centre 2014,” but the underground car park it funded still needs public subsidy, running at only 15–30% utilisation — a cautionary data point on parking-funded public space renewal.
Tallinn’s Baltijaama market renovation measurably catalysed area-wide change: Foursquare data comparing 2018 to 2020 shows two new mixed-use activity clusters emerged just north of the market — genuine local economic knock-on effect, not just a nicer square.
Across all five cases, the recurring success factors were traffic reduction, a genuine mix of necessary and optional activity, and public-private frontage synergy — not any single design move.
Pictures

More space projects

All 61 →
Space
City of Warsaw
2019
SPIN Unit · Helsinki — Tallinn
Project record No. 31
Lens:
Space
Reports:
—
Warsaw Spatial Development Scenarios
SPIN UnitRead the record →
Space
City of Narva
2020
SPIN Unit · Helsinki — Tallinn
Project record No. 35
Lens:
Space
Reports:
2
ReCenter Narva — Youth Vision for Narva 2035
SPIN UnitRead the record →
Space
City of Tallinn
2019
SPIN Unit · Helsinki — Tallinn
Project record No. 29
Lens:
Space
Reports:
1
metaLINN - Tallinn City Center Development study
SPIN UnitRead the record →
Space
Municipality of Sipoo
2020
SPIN Unit · Helsinki — Tallinn
Project record No. 36
Lens:
Space
Reports:
2
Nikkilä Colour Analysis
SPIN UnitRead the record →
Space
Strelka KB
2020
SPIN Unit · Helsinki — Tallinn
Project record No. 37
Lens:
Space
Reports:
1
Ethical Use of Urban Data
SPIN UnitRead the record →