← All projects/Space/No. 47
2022 · Space · Forum Virium Helsinki

Experimentation Evaluation Toolkit — Ylä-Malmi Pilot

Cities run placemaking experiments constantly but rarely measure whether they work — this project built a reusable toolkit for choosing the right metrics, then tested it on a real square in Helsinki.

Experimentation Evaluation Toolkit — Ylä-Malmi Pilot

Living-lab and placemaking experiments are cheap to run and hard to evaluate well — practitioners are often left guessing which of dozens of possible metrics actually matter for a given intervention. Forum Virium wanted a general-purpose framework for making that choice, validated against a real case.

Commissioned via tender, delivered as a subcontract under agency Miltton, with support from the Nordic Smart City Network, Nordic Innovation, and Helsinki Innovation Districts. Piloted on Ylä-Malmi square, where the city had installed modular street furniture with wildflower planters (tended by a local kindergarten) between April and August 2022.

Built a library of roughly 100 candidate urban metrics grounded in academic literature, narrowed to 48 relevant ones and then 20 fully documented “toolkit cards,” organised across three dimensions — Space, Activity, Culture — each assessed through physical, digital, and hybrid data sources. Fifteen of the twenty metrics were actually tested at Ylä-Malmi, combining space-syntax network analysis, camera-based footfall and dwell-time sensing, Foursquare visit data, and digital ethnography of geotagged Instagram photos.

Delivered as an 80-page toolkit with full methodology cards, plus a public talk presenting the approach.

2 reports to download
About the project
ClientForum Virium Helsinki
PlaceYlä-Malmi, Helsinki, Finland
Year2022
LensSpace
TopicsEvaluation Methodology, Living Labs, Placemaking
What we found
Ylä-Malmi square ranked as the 5th most-visited place within a 5-minute walk, roughly on par with the area’s supermarkets — a genuine local landmark, just not a city-scale destination.
82% of geotagged Instagram photos near the square were taken indoors — a strong signal the outdoor space itself isn’t seen as attractive enough to photograph.
Only 9% of analysed photos showed people socialising in the square, and just 1 in 100 showed any spontaneous, unplanned use — low measured vitality despite the square’s large, open, flat surface.
The furniture and wildflower intervention had limited measurable impact — it didn’t shift the square’s digital image or draw in the most active 25–34 age demographic, most likely because its visual scale was too small relative to the size of the square.
Nearby public transit stops draw major foot traffic that mostly bypasses the square itself — flagged as a clear, currently unrealised opportunity for future interventions.
Pictures

More space projects

All 61 →
Space
City of Tallinn
2022
SPIN Unit · Helsinki — Tallinn
Project record No. 52
Lens:
Space
Reports:
1
Tallinn Green Factor (Rohefaktor)
SPIN UnitRead the record →
Space
TELT
2023
SPIN Unit · Helsinki — Tallinn
Project record No. 54
Lens:
Space
Reports:
1
SMARTLAND by TELT — Interactive Storymap
SPIN UnitRead the record →
Space
UNDP Kosovo
2023
SPIN Unit · Helsinki — Tallinn
Project record No. 55
Lens:
Space
Reports:
1
Block 1 — Reimagining a Socialist-Era Superblock in Prishtina
SPIN UnitRead the record →
Space
UNDP Armenia
2020
SPIN Unit · Helsinki — Tallinn
Project record No. 39
Lens:
Space
Reports:
1
metaMorphology analysis of Yerevan Circular Park
SPIN UnitRead the record →
Space
Strelka KB
2020
SPIN Unit · Helsinki — Tallinn
Project record No. 37
Lens:
Space
Reports:
1
Ethical Use of Urban Data
SPIN UnitRead the record →